Hi all,
While testing a Firewall-1 load-balanced cluster today, I played briefly
with a secondary synchronisation network to see what the benefits might
be. I assumed that having a second network would allow for a failure on
one. This would be handy in the event that a switch fails. I've since
discovered that if one synchronisation interface on a module fails, that
module falls out of the cluster.
I've since scoured the ClusterXL documentation, Checkpoint's knowledge
base, and the archives from this mailing list, and I can't find any
reason for having a secondary synchronisation network. Can anyone give
me an explanation as to why I might do this? I'm sure there is some
benefit, but I'm having trouble finding it...
Thanks,
David Aitchison.
=================================================
To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
send an email to LISTSERV AT amadeus.us.checkpoint DOT com
in the BODY of the email add:
set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
=================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
=================================================
If you have any questions on how to change your
subscription options, email
fw-1-owner AT ts.checkpoint DOT com
=================================================
|
