Hi there,
one of my clients wants a failover firewall. However, he is one of those
clients that don't want to spend money and go with the smallest firewalls.
So he is currently using a Nokia 120. I explained to him that this box
doesn't properly support VRRP because there is no extra ethernet interface
to carry the state-sync stuff.
Now I read on a data sheet about Nokia's new IP40 boxes, that they can do
VRRP without state-sync. Does that make sense? What would be the drawbacks
of having no state sync (other than maybe having to reconnect current FTP or
Telnet sessions)?
Sascha
=================================================
To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
send an email to LISTSERV AT amadeus.us.checkpoint DOT com
in the BODY of the email add:
set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
=================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
=================================================
If you have any questions on how to change your
subscription options, email
fw-1-owner AT ts.checkpoint DOT com
=================================================
|
