Firewall-1

Re: [FW-1] ASF or Nokia?

Subject: Re: [FW-1] ASF or Nokia?
From: Boston ninety <boston90 AT POSTMASTER.CO DOT UK>
To: FW-1-MAILINGLIST AT AMADEUS.US.CHECKPOINT DOT COM
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 11:33:28 +0100
 ASF stands for Alteon (now owned by Nortel) Switched Firewall.

Hardware set-up consists of one or two 'accelerators' with between 1 to 6 
'directors'. There are various different hardware models, of which some are 
integrated, i.e. one appliance can consist of both a director and an 
accelerator (and can then be doubled up, a bit like using Nokia HA solution), 
and of which others consist of separate Accelerator(s) and separate director(s).

View this setup a bit like how one might see an IBM server running a Check 
Point NG enforcement module (the director) but with a separate network card 
with its own ports and power supply (the accelerator).

Although one can install the CP NG Smart Centre server on to a director, the 
above is the best way I can think of to describe the architecture.

The last time I checked (I think since version 3x of the code), NAT was indeed 
being successfully negotiated by the ASF clusters, as indeed were all normal 
Check Point features _including Smart Defence_. Alteon use Secure XL API to 
produce their own 'mirrored' state table (a mirror of the table found on the 
directors) on the accelerator ASIC, effectively meaning that after the initial 
connection is accepted, all subsequent packets are forwarded 'in hardware', at 
least until they enter the FIN sequence (for TCP). This is not the case for 
application level inspection however, so all smart defence, indeed anything 
that uses Check Points Security servers, is always going to be passed to the 
directors and therefore not forwarded in hardware.

The most powerful set-up is 6 directors, each passing 500,000 concurrent 
connections (cc), I've no idea what the new connections per second is but 
obviously for true failover, each could only contain 250,000 cc. Whereas the 
IP740 (smaller model that the IP12xx and IP2250) can handle 907406 TCP 
connections on its own. These nodes (not the hardware based IP2250) can be 
clustered (up to 4 is it?) so you can do the maths.

Speaking from experience, I have found Alteons to be flaky but getting better 
with each new iteration of code. The ASM (manager) is still rubbish though, 
i.e. it is high maintenance and often breaks. Nokias are good, have world class 
support and are more reliable.

Boston


___________________________________________________
Take your business online with Officemaster. Sign up for a free trial today!

http://www.officemaster.net

=================================================
To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
send an email to LISTSERV AT amadeus.us.checkpoint DOT com
in the BODY of the email add:
set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
=================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
=================================================
If you have any questions on how to change your
subscription options, email
fw-1-owner AT ts.checkpoint DOT com
=================================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>