Firewall-1

Re: [FW-1] checkpoint | cisco concentrator [route issue?]

Subject: Re: [FW-1] checkpoint | cisco concentrator [route issue?]
From: ". security" <firewall_security AT HOTMAIL DOT COM>
To: FW-1-MAILINGLIST AT AMADEUS.US.CHECKPOINT DOT COM
Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 17:50:47 -0500
Well thought this riddle was solved.  Got the concentrator up and working in
the
DMZ.  Both interfaces are responding to ICMP from inside my network & the
public
interface is accepting logins.

However that's where things stop working, I can login to the concentrator
from outside
my network but that's it.  I'm not able to reach anything inside my network.
 It appears
traffic doesn't know how to reach the client.  Better put I think I may have
a return
route issue.

Just trying a few things I was able to apply a band aide using this route in
the firewall
It says traffic on 10.200.50.0 [internal subnet] use 192.168.50.50
[concentrator] private
interface as a gateway
10.200.50.0/255.255.255.0 192.168.50.50

That route statement while partially effective makes the firewall
inaccessible from inside my
network.

Thoughts?? I'm pretty close here & would really like to get this working!


From: Rob Schrack <rob_schrack AT URMC.ROCHESTER DOT EDU>
Reply-To: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1
<FW-1-MAILINGLIST AT AMADEUS.US.CHECKPOINT DOT COM>
To: FW-1-MAILINGLIST AT AMADEUS.US.CHECKPOINT DOT COM
Subject: Re: [FW-1] checkpoint | cisco concentrator [design thoughts]
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 19:34:42 -0400

Re: [FW-1] checkpoint | cisco concentrator [design thoughts]Authentication
is being provided via radius with an active directory backend.  We tend to
use AD groups for employee/researcher types and individual accounts with
far more restrictive FW-1 rules for vendors and others.

The whole idea was to keep the concentrator config as simple as possible.
All rules to limit user access are on the Checkpoint box.  The link between
the concentrator & firewall is tapped, so we can also throw in a sniffer or
IDS box if we feel the need.

My apologies for the tone of my original reply... I should know better than
to reply when exhausted.

Rob


  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Ray
  To: FW-1-MAILINGLIST AT AMADEUS.US.CHECKPOINT DOT COM
  Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 10:33 AM
  Subject: Re: [FW-1] checkpoint | cisco concentrator [design thoughts]


  Yes, correct, I didn't phrase that properly. One issue I would see with
your
  method is that the external interface of the concentrator is still fully
  exposed to the Internet. I feel better having Check Point's stateful
  firewall in front of everything because, well, it is a firewall.

  With your method, how do you know that the traffic coming off the
internal
  interface of the concentrator is authorized? Is there any way for you to
  limit down the concentrator trafic by user or are you doing that on the
  concentrator itself?

  Take care,

  Ray



  >From: Rob Schrack <rob_schrack AT URMC.ROCHESTER DOT EDU>
  >Reply-To: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1
  ><FW-1-MAILINGLIST AT AMADEUS.US.CHECKPOINT DOT COM>
  >To: FW-1-MAILINGLIST AT AMADEUS.US.CHECKPOINT DOT COM
  >Subject: Re: [FW-1] checkpoint | cisco concentrator [design thoughts]
  >Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 00:24:52 -0400
  >
  >Re: [FW-1] checkpoint | cisco concentrator [design thoughts]Short
circuit
  >around the firewall?  That's not putting it in front, that's putting it
in
  >parallel.
  >
  >Our 3030 is entirely in front of our firewall.  It's external interface
is
  >plugged into the same router as our IP530's external interface.  It's
  >internal interface is plugged INTO the IP530.  That way I can filter
  >inbound
  >destinations & ports using the decrypted traffic.  Plus I can do it
using
  >the same FW-1 policy that I do for anything else trying to come in from
the
  >Internet.
  >
  >Rob
  >----- Original Message -----
  >From: Ray
  >To: FW-1-MAILINGLIST AT AMADEUS.US.CHECKPOINT DOT COM
  >Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 11:12 PM
  >Subject: Re: [FW-1] checkpoint | cisco concentrator [design thoughts]
  >
  >
  >Nothing, repeat NOTHING, in my company is in front of a firewall. The
  >question is not whether it should be behind a firewall, the question is
why
  >it should be exposed to the Internet when it could be put behind a
  >firewall.
  >I had a 3030 concentrator behind CP for awhile and it worked fine. We
used
  >UDP Encapsulation. We filtered everything hitting the concentrator to
make
  >sure only the needed ports and protocols were allowed. Putting it in
front
  >of the firewall = a potential short circuit around the firewall. A
small
  >potential to be sure, but it's still there and does not need to be.
  >Ray
  >>From: ". security" <firewall_security AT HOTMAIL DOT COM>
  >>Reply-To: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1
  >><FW-1-MAILINGLIST AT AMADEUS.US.CHECKPOINT DOT COM>
  >>To: FW-1-MAILINGLIST AT AMADEUS.US.CHECKPOINT DOT COM
  >>Subject: [FW-1] checkpoint | cisco concentrator [design thoughts]
  >>Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 20:09:56 -0500
  >>
  >>We are going over a new network design, and trying to determine if
this is
  >>overkill.  Is it necessary to put a Cisco concentrator behind a
firewall?
  >>I
  >>haven't been able to find a a lot of documentation indacting that it's
  >>necessary.
  >>
  >>Here's the design we've come up with:
  >>-public interface, located in the dmz statically NATd to a public
address
  >>-private interface also located in the same DMZ but on a different
network
  >>this interface is pointed towards the internal network.
  >>
  >>
  >>internet
  >>    |
  >>[firewall]-------------------------------------------------|DMZ
  >>       |          |                              |
  >>       |        public int [NATd]      private int [faces back to
internal
  >>net]
  >>       |
  >>internal network
  >>
  >>
  >>
  >>thoughts?
  >>
  >>=================================================
  >>To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
  >>send an email to LISTSERV AT amadeus.us.checkpoint DOT com
  >>in the BODY of the email add:
  >>set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
  >>=================================================
  >>To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
  >>please see the instructions at
  >>http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
  >>=================================================
  >>If you have any questions on how to change your
  >>subscription options, email
  >>fw-1-owner AT ts.checkpoint DOT com
  >>=================================================
  >=================================================
  >To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
  >send an email to LISTSERV AT amadeus.us.checkpoint DOT com
  >in the BODY of the email add:
  >set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
  >=================================================
  >To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
  >please see the instructions at
  >http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
  >=================================================
  >If you have any questions on how to change your
  >subscription options, email
  >fw-1-owner AT ts.checkpoint DOT com
  >=================================================
  >
  >=================================================
  >To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
  >send an email to LISTSERV AT amadeus.us.checkpoint DOT com
  >in the BODY of the email add:
  >set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
  >=================================================
  >To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
  >please see the instructions at
  >http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
  >=================================================
  >If you have any questions on how to change your
  >subscription options, email
  >fw-1-owner AT ts.checkpoint DOT com
  >=================================================

  =================================================
  To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
  send an email to LISTSERV AT amadeus.us.checkpoint DOT com
  in the BODY of the email add:
  set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
  =================================================
  To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
  please see the instructions at
  http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
  =================================================
  If you have any questions on how to change your
  subscription options, email
  fw-1-owner AT ts.checkpoint DOT com
  =================================================

=================================================
To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
send an email to LISTSERV AT amadeus.us.checkpoint DOT com
in the BODY of the email add:
set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
=================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
=================================================
If you have any questions on how to change your
subscription options, email
fw-1-owner AT ts.checkpoint DOT com
=================================================

=================================================
To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
send an email to LISTSERV AT amadeus.us.checkpoint DOT com
in the BODY of the email add:
set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
=================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
=================================================
If you have any questions on how to change your
subscription options, email
fw-1-owner AT ts.checkpoint DOT com
=================================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>