FirewallWizards
[Top] [All Lists]

[fw-wiz] QoS question

To: "Firewall Wizards Security Mailing List" <firewall-wizards@listserv.icsalabs.com>
Subject: [fw-wiz] QoS question
From: "Brian Loe" <knobdy@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:18:48 -0600
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: fwwizards-list2@consult.net
Delivered-to: firewall-wizards@listserv.icsalabs.com
List-archive: <https://listserv.icsalabs.com/pipermail/firewall-wizards>
List-help: <mailto:firewall-wizards-request@listserv.icsalabs.com?subject=help>
List-id: Firewall Wizards Security Mailing List <firewall-wizards.listserv.icsalabs.com>
List-post: <mailto:firewall-wizards@listserv.icsalabs.com>
List-subscribe: <https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards>, <mailto:firewall-wizards-request@listserv.icsalabs.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards>, <mailto:firewall-wizards-request@listserv.icsalabs.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: Firewall Wizards Security Mailing List <firewall-wizards@listserv.icsalabs.com>
Sender: firewall-wizards-bounces@listserv.icsalabs.com
Not directly related to firewalls, but I'm wondering if the folks on
here have an opinion on the better QoS scheme for WAN connections you
control both sides of (using Cisco routers)? It would seem the two
most obvious options are priority queues and custom queues. I've read
what I can find for free on the 'Net and I'm still not sure I
understand the differences! :)

Does your opinion change if there is a firewall involved (got it in
after all anyway)?
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@listserv.icsalabs.com
https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>