FirewallWizards
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [fw-wiz] incoming NAT/PATs for VPN users

To: Firewall Wizards Security Mailing List <firewall-wizards@listserv.icsalabs.com>
Subject: Re: [fw-wiz] incoming NAT/PATs for VPN users
From: Josh <lostman@liquidcode.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 09:02:40 -0600
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: fwwizards-list2@consult.net
Delivered-to: firewall-wizards@listserv.icsalabs.com
In-reply-to: <3c4611bc0702091350y41baaf8dwfe932f74ed612b0e@mail.gmail.com>
List-archive: <https://listserv.icsalabs.com/pipermail/firewall-wizards>
List-help: <mailto:firewall-wizards-request@listserv.icsalabs.com?subject=help>
List-id: Firewall Wizards Security Mailing List <firewall-wizards.listserv.icsalabs.com>
List-post: <mailto:firewall-wizards@listserv.icsalabs.com>
List-subscribe: <https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards>, <mailto:firewall-wizards-request@listserv.icsalabs.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards>, <mailto:firewall-wizards-request@listserv.icsalabs.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <3c4611bc0702091350y41baaf8dwfe932f74ed612b0e@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: Firewall Wizards Security Mailing List <firewall-wizards@listserv.icsalabs.com>
Sender: firewall-wizards-bounces@listserv.icsalabs.com
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207)
You can do this with 7.x I know ( pix and ASA ). Pretty sure you can on 
6.x also but don't hold me to that.


Brian Loe wrote:
> Lets say company A has a customer, company B. Company A needs to
> provide access to several (lets say many) resources within its network
> to a thousand or so employees at company B. Seems to me that you could
> simply PAT all of company B's connections when they arrive and the
> magic of networking should get them routed to the resources you've
> allowed them and back without any problem. Is there something I'm
> missing here?
>
> Is an incoming PAT not available on, for instance, an ASA? What about
> a PIX at 6.x or 7.x? What about incoming NAT pools for over a thousand
> possible users? Anything change if they're physically coming in on a
> DMZ port as opposed to the outside port - and needing access to
> resources in another, lower DMZ port (don't ask why a VPN customer
> would be trusted more than company A's web servers, that's just how it
> is in this virtual company)?
>
> I know we're not alone in providing VPN access to customers but I'm
> virtually convinced everyone else is doing it better. I'm just hunting
> real world examples of the "right way" of doing it.
> _______________________________________________
> firewall-wizards mailing list
> firewall-wizards@listserv.icsalabs.com
> https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
>
>   


_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@listserv.icsalabs.com
https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>