|
Not completely accurate. Obviously there is the hardware differences between them (such as one being a module which can save rack space) and the other asa or pix is an appliance. The main advantage of the fwsm is the throughput as these are directly connected to the backplane of the layer 3 switches. Their are subtle other differences but this is the main one that I can think of off the top of my head without going to the cisco site.
hope this helps Kevin On 4/25/07, Avishai Wool <yash@acm.org> wrote: AFAIK the FWSM is essentially a PIX 7.x that is stuck inside a _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards@listserv.icsalabs.com https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [fw-wiz] Cisco ASA and FWSM, Douglas C. Stephens |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [fw-wiz] Cisco ASA and FWSM, D Sharp |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [fw-wiz] Cisco ASA and FWSM, Douglas C. Stephens |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [fw-wiz] Cisco ASA and FWSM, Security Guy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |