FirewallWizards
[Top] [All Lists]

[fw-wiz] Firewall scaling

To: <firewall-wizards@listserv.icsalabs.com>
Subject: [fw-wiz] Firewall scaling
From: "Sami Ghourabi" <sami.ghourabi@online-netsecurity.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 13:40:29 +0200
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: fwwizards-list2@consult.net
Delivered-to: firewall-wizards@listserv.icsalabs.com
List-archive: <https://listserv.icsalabs.com/pipermail/firewall-wizards>
List-help: <mailto:firewall-wizards-request@listserv.icsalabs.com?subject=help>
List-id: Firewall Wizards Security Mailing List <firewall-wizards.listserv.icsalabs.com>
List-post: <mailto:firewall-wizards@listserv.icsalabs.com>
List-subscribe: <https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards>, <mailto:firewall-wizards-request@listserv.icsalabs.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards>, <mailto:firewall-wizards-request@listserv.icsalabs.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: Firewall Wizards Security Mailing List <firewall-wizards@listserv.icsalabs.com>
Sender: firewall-wizards-bounces@listserv.icsalabs.com
Thread-index: Ace1i0yvjsoapw0jQoedWnbgXrraRA==
Hi List,

I'm trying to convince management that a firewall that supports 32000
concurrent sessions is enough for an organization that has a single WAN
internet link, and about 60-100 users, but I'm lacking arguments.

What do you think about that statement? Are there any rational methods
available for firewall performance scaling (concurrent sessions, new
sessions per second, throughput, etc.)

Any answer/resource appreciated.

Best Regards.

_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@listserv.icsalabs.com
https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>