IPfilter
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: NAT and age

To: darrenr@reed.wattle.id.au
Subject: Re: NAT and age
From: Christian Karpp <xn@heidelbg.ibm.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 08:44:57 +0100
Cc: ipfilter@coombs.anu.edu.au
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: ipfilter-list@securepoint.com
In-reply-to: <458C04D5.60905@reed.wattle.id.au>
Organization: IBM Mannheim, Germany
References: <458BD3E1.7070601@heidelbg.ibm.com> <458BE04B.8010004@reed.wattle.id.au> <458BE9EC.1060903@heidelbg.ibm.com> <458C04D5.60905@reed.wattle.id.au>
Sender: owner-ipfilter@coombs.anu.edu.au
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915
Darren Reed wrote:

> ahh, try "ipfstat | grep Ticks"...

OK, now I can see that the counter does not increase.
It's always "IPF Ticks: 0"

However, I don't see the link yet between IPF ticks in ipfilters and the age counter in ipnat. Do ipfilters have to run (e.g. with at least a "pass all") in order to make ipnat work?

ck


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>