| To: | ipfilter@coombs.anu.edu.au |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Policy Routing, and Passing or Blocking when using 'to'. |
| From: | "Michael Gorsuch" <michael.gorsuch@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:21:35 -0500 |
| Delivered-to: | sp-com-lists@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | ipfilter-list@securepoint.com |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=OeeT+IANVStWYuj/lRO2VMjiEipGQ/L1gkdV82QGYhU+h/xHODDIMbLfy/2k82pV8Fw59l1nPfG4w5sbpT5eV9DaCO7je8vwTNp+gATm6qMhhfzqo6v2JwCAEOse9g6AKNnlc//1R1j5mjvDIG4dyCmMdgCDfPBjiJrhDa8xXR0= |
| Sender: | owner-ipfilter@coombs.anu.edu.au |
I working on a policy routing setup to send certain host traffic out to the internet over a specific interface. Which of these is the correct method to pass the traffic? pass out quick on xl0 out to xl1:1.2.3.4 from 2.2.2.2 to any block out quick on xl0 out to xl1:1.2.3.4 from 2.2.2.2 to any In this example, 1.2.3.4 is the next hop for xl1, and 2.2.2.2 is the host inside my network. I have seen what seems to be a contradiction in opinions on this topic, and really want to understand it better before I start deploying this. Thanks, Michael Gorsuch |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: building ipfilter 4.1.16 on Linuc 2.6.16-ck3, problems, John Serink |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Do not use GNU make (gmake) to compile IPFilter, Muggeridge, Matt |
| Previous by Thread: | building ipfilter 4.1.16 on Linuc 2.6.16-ck3, problems, John Serink |
| Next by Thread: | Do not use GNU make (gmake) to compile IPFilter, Muggeridge, Matt |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |