| To: | Corey Johnston <coreyj@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: please test next candidate for 4.1.17 |
| From: | Darren Reed <darrenr@reed.wattle.id.au> |
| Date: | Wed, 17 Jan 2007 00:05:07 +0100 |
| Cc: | ipfilter@coombs.anu.edu.au |
| Delivered-to: | sp-com-lists@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | ipfilter-list@securepoint.com |
| In-reply-to: | <e2e114e10701152113m62ceab4dmb7fabc54ead157db@mail.gmail.com> |
| References: | <45AC1DDC.7020205@reed.wattle.id.au> <e2e114e10701152001w1040460aoe5711dafcfeea18f@mail.gmail.com> <e2e114e10701152113m62ceab4dmb7fabc54ead157db@mail.gmail.com> |
| Reply-to: | darrenr@reed.wattle.id.au |
| Sender: | owner-ipfilter@coombs.anu.edu.au |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) |
Corey Johnston wrote: > The problem I mentioned with the FTP proxy in ipnat still appears to > exist in 4.1next. > > That is, non-FTP connections seem to be incorrectly identified as FTP > and are being sent through the FTP proxy, causing performance to be > erradic and usually very slow. > > By disabling the FTP proxy, all works well, except for FTP, which > obviously doesn't work. > > For reference, the NAT ruleset is pretty uncomplicated: > > #map bge1 from 10.0.0.0/8 to 0.0.0.0/0 -> 0/32 proxy port ftp ftp/tcp Do you have the same problem if you do: map bge1 10.0.0.0/8 -> 0/32 proxy port ftp ftp/tcp Darren |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: please test next candidate for 4.1.17, Corey Johnston |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: please test next candidate for 4.1.17, Darren Reed |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: please test next candidate for 4.1.17, Corey Johnston |
| Next by Thread: | Re: please test next candidate for 4.1.17, Darren Reed |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |