IPfilter
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: please test next candidate for 4.1.17

To: Corey Johnston <coreyj@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: please test next candidate for 4.1.17
From: Darren Reed <darrenr@reed.wattle.id.au>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 00:32:32 +0100
Cc: ipfilter@coombs.anu.edu.au
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: ipfilter-list@securepoint.com
In-reply-to: <e2e114e10701152113m62ceab4dmb7fabc54ead157db@mail.gmail.com>
References: <45AC1DDC.7020205@reed.wattle.id.au> <e2e114e10701152001w1040460aoe5711dafcfeea18f@mail.gmail.com> <e2e114e10701152113m62ceab4dmb7fabc54ead157db@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: darrenr@reed.wattle.id.au
Sender: owner-ipfilter@coombs.anu.edu.au
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719)
Corey Johnston wrote:
> For reference, the NAT ruleset is pretty uncomplicated:
>
> #map bge1 from 10.0.0.0/8 to 0.0.0.0/0  -> 0/32 proxy port ftp ftp/tcp

The other thing to try is:

map bge1 from 10.0.0.0/8 to 0/0 port = 21 -> 0/32 proxy port ftp ftp/tcp

Darren


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>