| To: | "Buozis, Martynas" <martynas@ti.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: pfil and network performance |
| From: | Darren Reed <darrenr@reed.wattle.id.au> |
| Date: | Tue, 13 Feb 2007 22:51:26 -0800 |
| Cc: | ipfilter@coombs.anu.edu.au |
| Delivered-to: | sp-com-lists@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | ipfilter-list@securepoint.com |
| In-reply-to: | <1266A6320AD3884EA8142B354DFBA31A069ECF12@dfre02.ent.ti.com> |
| References: | <1266A6320AD3884EA8142B354DFBA31A069ECF12@dfre02.ent.ti.com> |
| Reply-to: | darrenr@reed.wattle.id.au |
| Sender: | owner-ipfilter@coombs.anu.edu.au |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) |
Buozis, Martynas wrote: > Hello > > I am running IPFilter installation on Solaris 8 (Generic_117350-41). > PFIL version is 2.1.11,REV=10:54:27 11/16/06. > > We noticed, that PFIL is causing big impact to network performance even > when IPFilter is stopped (just PFIL is loaded) and no rules are present. > 2GB file copy from NFS server took 35 minutes with PFIL loaded, while > without PFIL only 3 minutes were required to copy same file. > > Can somebody advice were problem is with PFIL ? > It shouldn't cause performance to drop this much...sounds like something is going wrong. The pfil module will stop any performance improvements due to hardware features such as checksum offload being activated. Darren |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Solaris 9 crashes with IP Filter, Vincent Fox |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Solaris 9 crashes with IP Filter, Darren Reed |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: pfil and network performance, Vincent Fox |
| Next by Thread: | RE: pfil and network performance, Buozis, Martynas |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |