IPfilter
[Top] [All Lists]

Need to skip an overload...ideas?

To: <ipfilter@coombs.anu.edu.au>
Subject: Need to skip an overload...ideas?
From: Peter Eisch <peter@boku.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 12:22:57 -0600
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: ipfilter-list@securepoint.com
Sender: owner-ipfilter@coombs.anu.edu.au
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.6.040913.0
I have an excerpt like this:

# **** hide the office from others ****
map en0 from 201.2.30.0/24 to any -> 201.3.34.25/32 proxy port ftp ftp/tcp
map en0 from 201.2.30.0/24 to any -> 201.3.34.25/32 portmap auto
map en0 from 201.2.30.0/24 to any -> 201.3.34.25/32
# end of office hiding

Which enables me to hide all the office traffic behind the address noted.  I
now have a need to leak the office traffic out to systems on the
201.3.34.24/29 LAN.

For example, traffic between 201.2.30.22 and 201.3.34.27 would not be NAT'd.

Is there way clever way to rewrite the rule to use !to or some sort of
boolean logic so I don't have to fully enumerate the 'any' in the above
example?

Thanks,

peter


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>