| To: | ipfilter@coombs.anu.edu.au |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: keep state "issue" / possible feature for the future? |
| From: | Jefferson Ogata <Jefferson.Ogata@noaa.gov> |
| Date: | Fri, 02 Mar 2007 15:05:16 +0000 |
| Delivered-to: | sp-com-lists@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | ipfilter-list@securepoint.com |
| In-reply-to: | <200703021153.l22BrDXq006406@anumail9.anu.edu.au> |
| References: | <200703011819.l21IJmJo029596@anumail7.anu.edu.au> <45E72401.4050403@ucdavis.edu> <200703021153.l22BrDXq006406@anumail9.anu.edu.au> |
| Sender: | owner-ipfilter@coombs.anu.edu.au |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/4.0 (compatible;MSIE 5.5; Windows 98) |
Boy, I just love responding to a top-posted rats nest. Learn a little netiquette, people. On 2007-03-02 11:53, chrisj@ucia.gov wrote: > Solaris does indeed use the multiple interfaces > in a seemingly random way (well, it really isn't > random ... I'm sure there is a very logical approach > but to the occasional telnet, ssh, scp, or NFS > application it appears random :-). Is this (or at least the original poster's issue) not something that is controlled via ip_strict_dst_multihoming? -- Jefferson Ogata <Jefferson.Ogata@noaa.gov> NOAA Computer Incident Response Team (N-CIRT) <ncirt@noaa.gov> "Never try to retrieve anything from a bear."--National Park Service |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | insight on S10 ipfilter patch 125014-02?, Jeff A. Earickson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: keep state "issue" / possible feature for the future?, Tom Ploegmakers |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: keep state "issue" / possible feature for the future?, chrisj |
| Next by Thread: | Re: keep state "issue" / possible feature for the future?, Tom Ploegmakers |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |