IPfilter
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: keep state "issue" / possible feature for the future?

To: ipfilter@coombs.anu.edu.au
Subject: Re: keep state "issue" / possible feature for the future?
From: adh@an.bradford.ma.us (Sandwich Maker)
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 14:47:31 -0500 (EST)
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: ipfilter-list@securepoint.com
Sender: owner-ipfilter@coombs.anu.edu.au
" From: "Stuart Remphrey" <stuart.remphrey@rmit.edu.au>
" 
" 
" 
" In (almost) all cases we now use IPMP with interfaces
" marked as standby so only one is active at a time,
" although it's not ideal. Trunking (aka Etherchannel)
" might be another way around it - this is at MAC layer,
" all interfaces in group have same MAC/ipaddr's,
" but it has other restrictions (eg. can't group ether+atm,
" which you can do with IPMP if you really want to).

but you should be able to ipmp a trunked group, since logically the
trunk is a single if.
________________________________________________________________________
Andrew Hay                                  the genius nature
internet rambler                            is to see what all have seen
adh@an.bradford.ma.us                       and think what none thought

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>