| To: | forge <forge@eyou.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: question about h323 nat proxy |
| From: | Darren Reed <darrenr@reed.wattle.id.au> |
| Date: | Sat, 03 Mar 2007 14:50:19 -0800 |
| Cc: | ipfilter@coombs.anu.edu.au |
| Delivered-to: | sp-com-lists@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | ipfilter-list@securepoint.com |
| In-reply-to: | <372075001.20461@eyou.com> |
| References: | <372075001.20461@eyou.com> |
| Reply-to: | darrenr@reed.wattle.id.au |
| Sender: | owner-ipfilter@coombs.anu.edu.au |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) |
forge wrote: > Hello, everyone > I need support h.323 application on my ipf firewall box and found in some > mails that there might be some problems in ipf h.323 nat proxy. So I read > its code.(ip_h323_pxy.c). > There is indeed a line of code confusing me in ippr_h245_out() func. > nat2 = nat_outlookup(fin->fin_ifp, IPN_UDP, IPPROTO_UDP, ip->ip_src, > ip->ip_dst); > The 1st para of nat_outlookup() should be fr_info_t * type, but > fin->fin_ifp is obviously > not this type. Why pass fin->fin_ifp to function here? May anyone > give comment? Looks like a bug to me - it should be "fin". Thanks, Darren |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: pfil2.1.11 performance issues - pfil_printmchain sprintf, Darren Reed |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: insight on S10 ipfilter patch 125014-02?, Ricardo M. Stella |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: pfil2.1.11 performance issues - pfil_printmchain sprintf, Darren Reed |
| Next by Thread: | FreeBSD6.2 ipfilter 4.1.13 OOW-patch?, Roger Olofsson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |