| To: | Yenting Chen -陳彥廷 <Speedo.Chen@zyxel.com.tw> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: A question about frpr_routing6 function in IPF4.1.22 |
| From: | Darren Reed <darrenr@reed.wattle.id.au> |
| Date: | Wed, 23 May 2007 23:47:02 -0700 |
| Cc: | ipfilter@coombs.anu.edu.au |
| Delivered-to: | sp-com-lists@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | ipfilter-list@securepoint.com |
| In-reply-to: | <8D5C6A676322304CA638A20DA6DEC6E0F995EB@ZyTWBE03.ZyXEL.com> |
| References: | <8D5C6A676322304CA638A20DA6DEC6E0F995EB@ZyTWBE03.ZyXEL.com> |
| Reply-to: | darrenr@reed.wattle.id.au |
| Sender: | owner-ipfilter@coombs.anu.edu.au |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) |
Yenting Chen -陳彥廷 wrote: > Or is there any RFCs specifics that the next header after routing > extension header MUST > 1. longer than 40 bytes? // ((shift < sizeof(struct ip6_hdr)) > 2. aligned on four bits? // ((shift - sizeof(struct > ip6_hdr)) & 15)) Yes, these are both defined in the IPv6 RFC. Darren |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | A question about frpr_routing6 function in IPF4.1.22, Yenting Chen -陳彥廷 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: A question about frpr_routing6 function in IPF4.1.22, Yenting Chen -陳彥廷 |
| Previous by Thread: | A question about frpr_routing6 function in IPF4.1.22, Yenting Chen -陳彥廷 |
| Next by Thread: | RE: A question about frpr_routing6 function in IPF4.1.22, Yenting Chen -陳彥廷 |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |