LARTC
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [LARTC] qos inside ipsec tunnel

To: "John Serink" <jserink2004@yahoo.com>, <smohan@vsnl.com>
Subject: Re: [LARTC] qos inside ipsec tunnel
From: "Martin Bene" <martin.bene@icomedias.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 11:15:01 +0100
Cc: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl, Marco Berizzi <pupilla@hotmail.com>
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: lartc-list@securepoint.com
Delivered-to: lartc@outpost.ds9a.nl
In-reply-to: <20061105223302.85109.qmail@web54508.mail.yahoo.com>
List-archive: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc>
List-help: <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=help>
List-id: "Mailinglist of the Linux Advanced Routing &amp; Traffic Control project" <lartc.mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-post: <mailto:lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc>, <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc>, <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: lartc-bounces@mailman.ds9a.nl
Thread-index: AccBKmIF1upg+U1ESmidLcwPf+DqFwAYb5zQ
Thread-topic: Re: [LARTC] qos inside ipsec tunnel
Ji John,

> Bring up a GRE tunnel inside the IPSec tunnel.
> Then use tc to shape the BW on the tunnel,
> Then use tc to shape the BW on the outgoing interface, eg ppp1.

I don't see what advantage you get from the nested tunnel configuration
you propose - why not simply shape on ppp1 and be done with it?

Bye, Martin
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>