LARTC
[Top] [All Lists]

[LARTC] Why did I need strange ceiling settings?

To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
Subject: [LARTC] Why did I need strange ceiling settings?
From: Philipp Leusmann <philipp.leusmann@rwth-aachen.de>
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 12:52:33 +0100
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: lartc-list@securepoint.com
Delivered-to: lartc@outpost.ds9a.nl
List-archive: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc>
List-help: <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=help>
List-id: "Mailinglist of the Linux Advanced Routing &amp; Traffic Control project" <lartc.mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-post: <mailto:lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc>, <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc>, <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: lartc-bounces@mailman.ds9a.nl
Thread-index: AccDLGBefnNn5k32Trqoi1uUgdANWA==
Hi all,

I recently installed traffic shaping on my ADSL line with a nominal upload
rate of 1MBit. My Modem says it has an upload bitrate of 843 kbits.
So I thought, to use a ceiling of 800kbit for the root qdisc is a good idea.
But with that setting I only achieved upload rates of around 300kbits
whereas I reached around 650 kbits without traffic shaping.
Yesterday I played a little with the ceiling value and found that increasing
it to 175kBps did the job.
Could anybody please explain this strange behaviour? 

My shaping script looks as follows:


_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>