LARTC
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [LARTC] Ingress qdisc bypassed on SNAT'ed traffic?

from [Andy Furniss] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: EKC <webmaster@generalsynthesis.com>
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Ingress qdisc bypassed on SNAT'ed traffic?
From: Andy Furniss <lists@andyfurniss.entadsl.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 12:23:18 +0000
Cc: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: lartc-list@securepoint.com
Delivered-to: lartc@outpost.ds9a.nl
In-reply-to: <355a4e960611052024v494d870l77e621d0e18e216c@mail.gmail.com>
List-archive: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc>
List-help: <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=help>
List-id: "Mailinglist of the Linux Advanced Routing &amp; Traffic Control project" <lartc.mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-post: <mailto:lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc>, <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc>, <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <355a4e960611051946s4759a7c2k5e8dbe9aa3755342@mail.gmail.com> <454EB474.4050702@vsnl.com> <355a4e960611052024v494d870l77e621d0e18e216c@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: lists@andyfurniss.entadsl.com
Sender: lartc-bounces@mailman.ds9a.nl
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-GB; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060417 
EKC wrote:

Unfortunately, that NAT gateway address should have been a routable
address (I'm debugging this in vmware at the moment).

Considering that, it looks like I'm going to have to play around with IMQ.
If you say no to packet action in kernel config then you get to choose the old policer - which does hook after deNAT. 

Andy.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [LARTC] QoS over Wireless network, Andy Furniss
Next by Date:  Re: [LARTC] Strategy for penalising IPs with too many simultaneous sessions, Andy Furniss
Previous by Thread:  Re: [LARTC] Ingress qdisc bypassed on SNAT'ed traffic?, EKC
Next by Thread:  [LARTC] Dual CPU performance in routing, GolemMTM
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]