Re: [LARTC] HTB prio: global or per class ?

[Viktar Sakovich <atlantos@gmail.com>]

On Friday 17 November 2006 09:57, you wrote:
> Okay
>
> Which among you rightly? Who tests that ?

Me for example.

> If the the prio is global, it's strange and not very usefull and limit a
> lot the HTB scheduler.

I agree. But it's the way it works.

> Normaly if HTB respecte the diffserv, the prio are per class basis.
> Why is it global a
>
> 2006/11/16, Viktar Sakovich <atlantos@gmail.com>:
> > On Thursday 16 November 2006 19:26, you wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Is the prio specification in the htb class global or is it on a per
> > > class basis ?
> > >
> > > A simple example:
> > >
> > > class 1:10 parent 1:
> > > class 1:100 parent 1:10 prio 3
> > >
> > > class 1:200 parent 1:10 prio 7
> > > class 1:201 parent 1:200 prio 1
> > > class 1:202 parent 1:200 prio 2
> > >
> > > Which class will get excessive bandwidth first? 100 or 201/202 ?
> >
> > Prio specification in the htb class is global. In this example 201/202
> > will
> > get all bandwidth.

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc