ArcosCom Linux User wrote:
> Thanks for your response.
>
> I'm using multiple gateways for internet connection and having problems
> with random disconection, and I not use ROUTE usually, but I was trying to
> force only one gateway for one type of traffic (which the clients lost
> conections and are having issues).
>
> I know I can use -j MARK or -j CONNMARK and this mark to filter, but I'm
> using marks for another purposes and I can't use it for routing.
Everything using marks supports bitmasks in 2.6.19.
> The box is a dual xeon and the kernel has been compiled SMP enabled.
>
> I haven't tested ROUTE yet with this kernel (2.6.19), but with 2.6.18.x I
> were having a problem with -j ROUTE in -t mangle and POSTROUTING chain.
>
> Perhaps ROUTE need a more in deepth revision?
As I said, it needs to fill in the targetsize field and probably needs
to adjust the target function signature.
> Do I help more reporting the bug into netfilter-bugzilla?
Its still down, but the ROUTE patch is unmaintained anyway.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
|