LARTC
[Top] [All Lists]

[LARTC] Re: iptables 1.3.7, kernel 2.6.19, ROUTE and Layer7 issues

To: linux@arcoscom.com
Subject: [LARTC] Re: iptables 1.3.7, kernel 2.6.19, ROUTE and Layer7 issues
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 10:17:02 +0100
Cc: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl, netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: lartc-list@securepoint.com
Delivered-to: lartc@outpost.ds9a.nl
In-reply-to: <44824.195.55.244.106.1166001170.squirrel@www.arcoscom.com>
List-archive: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc>
List-help: <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=help>
List-id: "Mailinglist of the Linux Advanced Routing &amp; Traffic Control project" <lartc.mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-post: <mailto:lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc>, <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc>, <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <54905.84.123.236.132.1165866276.squirrel@www.arcoscom.com> <57631.195.55.244.106.1165911878.squirrel@www.arcoscom.com> <457E6997.1050001@trash.net> <36479.195.55.244.106.1165998665.squirrel@www.arcoscom.com> <457FBBFD.6060009@trash.net> <44824.195.55.244.106.1166001170.squirrel@www.arcoscom.com>
Sender: lartc-bounces@mailman.ds9a.nl
User-agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017)
ArcosCom Linux User wrote:
> Then, the actual and updated and maintained substitute for ROUTE is using
> CONNMARK and/or MARK and then add filters/rules to routes table with ip.
> Am I in the truth?


That has always been the better way. The route target is a hack, I'm
don't know why it exists at all.

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>