Rangi Biddle wrote:
What do you think of perhaps Francois using SER?
Well, I don't have a problem with SIP Express Router and / or / verses
Asterisk (or any other SIP Soft Switch for that matter), however, I
think the OP will still be facing the same problem.
That problem being binding a daemon to a single IP address and routing
traffic to / from it with out messing up the packets. I am going to
presume that Asterisk and / or SER will only be bound to a specific
interface, not all of them. I'm not sure why the OP only wants to bind
Asterisk to a single interface verses all of them, though I'm going to
guess that s/he has a good reason for doing so.
It may be a case that Asterisk as the soft switch should be bound to the
internal interface and SER bound to the external interface. This way,
the SIP traffic can be passed through both interfaces natively, via both
daemons. However, I think this would be more undo complexity for very
little gain.
Grant. . . .
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
|