[LARTC] Are There better EQL devices

To:	<lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
Subject:	[LARTC] Are There better EQL devices
From:	"Joe Gavin" <JGavin@netuxsolutions.com>
Date:	Wed, 24 Jan 2007 08:25:44 -0600
Delivered-to:	sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to:	lartc-list@securepoint.com
Delivered-to:	lartc@outpost.ds9a.nl
List-archive:	<http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc>
List-help:	<mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=help>
List-id:	"Mailinglist of the Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control project" <lartc.mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-post:	<mailto:lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-subscribe:	<http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc>, <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc>, <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	lartc-bounces@mailman.ds9a.nl
Thread-index:	Acc/w4frZEALGxp3RZa4oMXHfuu1FQ==
Thread-topic:	Are There better EQL devices

I have set up one of our routers to use a TEQL Device to direct the outbound traffic but I would like to have a bit more control with how it sends out traffic. Is there a “better” EQL device that would allow me to say set the rate of the connections and have it fill up the first pipe then dump to the second then the third and so on so that an outbound connection could use the combined outbound connection more efficiently?

Joe Gavin

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[LARTC] Are There better EQL devices, Joe Gavin <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [LARTC] routing patches seem to break output nat, Tim Haak
Next by Date:	Re: [LARTC] know if packets are marked, Torsten Luettgert
Previous by Thread:	[LARTC] know if packets are marked, Roberto Pereyra
Next by Thread:	[LARTC] ip alias + dsl modem, GodSharp
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]