| To: | lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [LARTC] ipsec x.509 or kerberos |
| From: | "Caleb Cushing" <xenoterracide@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 31 Jan 2007 22:41:30 -0500 |
| Delivered-to: | sp-com-lists@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | lartc-list@securepoint.com |
| Delivered-to: | lartc@outpost.ds9a.nl |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=LOH7mGgyM4o4j1xFBU96mWboEwKDaVS6TRlluuaSrK3luOGsFBsky1NlNs4ewrs6gSSsMwgySd/7y1yj2NoJm7VfGZiU4dki56JpDmCjJN4sDZjFlpz87cTWoEfcX5WK5f46HdxuG2u2/gB1EeATVVmq9jGM7MM8s0rE8S7WM7s= |
| List-archive: | <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc> |
| List-help: | <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=help> |
| List-id: | "Mailinglist of the Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control project" <lartc.mailman.ds9a.nl> |
| List-post: | <mailto:lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc>, <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc>, <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | lartc-bounces@mailman.ds9a.nl |
I'm setting up a ipsec proxy (gentoo linux) I'm wondering whether I should use certificates or kerberos. I want it to be able to interact with windows. opinions? facts? which is more secure? _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [LARTC] Disable netfilter for bridged traffic, Radu Oprisan |
|---|---|
| Previous by Thread: | [LARTC] tc act ipt errors, Leigh Sharpe |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |