LARTC
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [LARTC] ?OT? Linux 2.6: bridge + routing firewall

To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
Subject: Re: [LARTC] ?OT? Linux 2.6: bridge + routing firewall
From: tomdeb <tom@debost.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 14:12:31 +0000
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: lartc-list@securepoint.com
Delivered-to: lartc@outpost.ds9a.nl
In-reply-to: <1171633030.4769.10.camel@localhost.localdomain>
List-archive: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc>
List-help: <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=help>
List-id: "Mailinglist of the Linux Advanced Routing &amp; Traffic Control project" <lartc.mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-post: <mailto:lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc>, <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc>, <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
References: <20070215154459.GC6325@softaplic.com.br> <1171633030.4769.10.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Sender: lartc-bounces@mailman.ds9a.nl
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13cvs-muttng (2007-01-26)

What you might be interested in as well is the physdev match witch will
let you filter traffic on physical devices

T o M

| On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 03:37:10PM +0200, ??????????? ?????? wrote:
I have some experience.

It seems that you should explicitely allow bridging in iptables as well
as in ebtables.

So, in addition to my bridge roules in ebtables I also have this rule in
iptables:

iptables -A FORWARD -i br0 -o br0 -j ACCEPT

Otherwise, it could block bridging by later rules or the policy.

?? ??????, 15/02/2007 ?? 13:44 -0200, Edesio Costa e Silva ??????????:
Hi All!

I need to deploy a bridge firewall using linux kernel 2.6. I had success
using kernel 2.4 plus br-nf patch. But the configuration does not work with
kernel 2.6.

If the default policy for the iptables FORWARD chain is ACCEPT I have a
bridge. If iptables FORWARD chain is DROP I have an insulator (no packet
flows). Any hint?

I did some google search and in many places they say "kernel 2.6 is not
recommended", "no luck with kernel 2.6", etc.

Any link to a success story of a bridge firewall with kernel 2.6? Any
personal experience?

Thanks in advance,

Edésio
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

--
?????????????????????? ???????????? <casper@meteor.dp.ua>

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>