LARTC
[Top] [All Lists]

[LARTC] Traffic Shaping over Satellite Internet

To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
Subject: [LARTC] Traffic Shaping over Satellite Internet
From: "Randy Wallace" <randywallacejr@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 12:11:34 +0300
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: lartc-list@securepoint.com
Delivered-to: lartc@outpost.ds9a.nl
Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=l9/h09H9U5E4T5bVK3/HlnUWVprQc9GcjJJIAiIsWgi6E3NcLfpEljcBFc8RQASv5ykuFY62fRajya6ODaUyVMnk2nVEBACfQ9YCx0+qGdDNvxfiMY+XL8UvMT4vOb+Cr+1m6nnUWhOYVuyO/HfVTHEcCnr7dddFaPRKB7wNWPk=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=eRKaKcxsXMYQ6KhA6RAW75iYFtR1fwz0pSJz2x8jsmVm9wvYQo7PDrOoOnCPjs+ZJ1D0r8z2QdRlX2wDeK+00WBrPh7w7Sch4squPC/2cPwWjIEu39qpDnoU9TU9ckmQ0aXCMoZmy/AlvLL9vU28QUzn3pNX1YaYG63Hf/iZMUA=
List-archive: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc>
List-help: <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=help>
List-id: "Mailinglist of the Linux Advanced Routing &amp; Traffic Control project" <lartc.mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-post: <mailto:lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc>, <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc>, <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: lartc-bounces@mailman.ds9a.nl
I've set up Traffic Shaping on a Linux Router.
Using HTB with SFQ, i'm trying to slow down
heavy downloading for 20 subscribers over
a 2048 kbit downlink.  I'm classifying internet related
traffic using iptables marking.

bri0 is my local lan bridge, receiving egress traffic destined for subscribers.

tc qdisc add dev bri0 root handle 1: htb default 2
tc class add dev bri0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 92129kbit ceil 102400kbit
tc class add dev bri0 parent 1:1 classid 1:2 htb rate 90072kbit ceil 92129kbit
tc class add dev bri0 parent 1:1 classid 1:3 htb rate 2048kbit ceil 92129kbit
# Non-Internet Local Lan Traffic
tc qdisc add dev bri0 parent 1:2 handle 2: sfq perturb 10
# Internet Traffic
tc class add dev bri0 parent 1:3 classid 1:9 htb rate 50kbit ceil 100kbit
# Unknown Internet Traffic
tc qdisc add dev bri0 parent 1:9 handle 9: sfq perturb 10
# Known Subscribers, based on IP Address, ea. subscriber gets their own class,
# starting with 1:10 (a script populates the classes for me)
tc class add dev bri0 parent 1:3 classid 1:(10->X) htb rate 100kbit ceil 400kbit
tc qdisc add dev bri0 parent 1:(10->X) handle (10->X): sfq perturb 10

Then the classifier:
# Send Internet traffic, marked 3, to Class 1:3
tc filter add dev bri0 protocol ip parent 1: prio 1 handle 3 fw flowid 1:3
# Send traffic, based on dest. IP to their corresponding classes
tc filter add dev bri0 protocol ip parent 1: prio 1 u32 match ip dst
10.200.0.(2->X)/32 flowid 1:((2->X) + 10)

Does this look like a good solution?  Can this really slow down heavy downloads,
so all subscribers can at least get ..some.. traffic?  Does traffic
shaping, not
policing, also drop packets when a HTB class exceeds it's rate, or does it just
wait until there are enough tokens?

Thank you for any guidance..
Randy
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>