LARTC
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [LARTC] thinking about multiple isp's

To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
Subject: Re: [LARTC] thinking about multiple isp's
From: Dave Cinege <dcinegemlists2@psychosis.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 13:01:44 -0500
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: lartc-list@securepoint.com
Delivered-to: lartc@outpost.ds9a.nl
In-reply-to: <BAY104-F24E4D43D493BAFA320F97EC56A0@phx.gbl>
List-archive: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc>
List-help: <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=help>
List-id: "Mailinglist of the Linux Advanced Routing &amp; Traffic Control project" <lartc.mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-post: <mailto:lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc>, <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc>, <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <BAY104-F24E4D43D493BAFA320F97EC56A0@phx.gbl>
Reply-to: dcinegemlists2@psychosis.com
Sender: lartc-bounces@mailman.ds9a.nl
User-agent: KMail/1.9.1
On Friday 23 March 2007 11:04, Dan Cook wrote:

> my idea is to use a bridge for the regular access and a route for the new
> application access. Sat a bridge from eth0 to eth1 but routing to newlink
> from eth0 to eth2.  I would like to use the linux box as the firewall for
> the newlink side of things.

More complex then probably needed:

                   /------------firewall 192.168.0.1/24 (3/4 T)
client-->(switching) hub 
                  \------------firewall 192.168.0.2/24 (NewLink)

client(s) static routes:
ip route add default via 192.168.0.1
ip route add <newlinkdstaddr> via 192.168.0.2

You could also use a different network (192.168.1.1/24) for Newlink
and add a second address to the client(s) eth's , if that makes more
sense.

Dave
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>