Leigh Sharpe wrote:
Nup. Well, not directly. This is going on our backbone, so I'm not taking traffic straight off the wireless. Ultimately, it will be delivered to a customer over a wireless link, but there's lots of ethernet between the QOS box and the wireless.
By the way, wireless != 802.11, there's plenty of other flavours which all taste just like ethernet.
It was the numifbs 1000 and your sig that made me think wireless customers.
I just saw a patch go in for ifb that fixes a potential crash.
http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg28168.html
Andy.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
|