[LARTC] Re: tc (CBQ) and UDP packets

[Christian Benvenuti <christian.benvenuti@libero.it>]

Hi, 
>> I have seen in my site something strange. I use tc-CBQ for bandwidth
>> shaping, and it works properly well. Sometimes i have seen UDP connections
>> spend more bandwidth than i set up to the user. I have 4 sites, and it
>> always happens. Is there a problem with bandwidth shaping and UDP packets?

>I have never used CBQ. It could be that you are measuring the bandwidth 
>before the queue - UDP won't usually back off in response to delay/drop 
>like TCP does.
>
> Andy

Andy is right. Did you verify it?
How/where are you measuring the rate?

Your config is supposed to work.
On which direction do you see the problem?
    Upload (i.e., eth1 to eth0), or
    Download (i.e., eth0 to eth1)?

Regards
/Christian
[http://benve.info]


_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc