LARTC
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [LARTC] PRIO and TBF is much better than HTB??

To: <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
Subject: RE: [LARTC] PRIO and TBF is much better than HTB??
From: "Simo" <simo@mix4web.de>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 13:53:55 +0200
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: lartc-list@securepoint.com
Delivered-to: lartc@outpost.ds9a.nl
In-reply-to: <002f01c793ad$574121a0$5964a8c0@SalimSi>
List-archive: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc>
List-help: <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=help>
List-id: "Mailinglist of the Linux Advanced Routing &amp; Traffic Control project" <lartc.mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-post: <mailto:lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc>, <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc>, <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <001501c793a7$7c3d4480$74b7cd80$@de> <002f01c793ad$574121a0$5964a8c0@SalimSi>
Sender: lartc-bounces@mailman.ds9a.nl
Thread-index: AceTrSTWg+//U4KURq22zqDeM+k4bQAFI4GA

Hi,

Thanks a lot for your explanations. J I ´ve looked for an advantage of HTB opposite the combination PRIO+TBF , because this combination seemed better to me. But I´ve forgotten ;) that  with HTB the unused Tokens can be distributed fairly on the other classes, so that the unused Bandwidth can fairly distributed on the other classes and that is not the case with the combination PRIO+TBF. That´s why I would prefer to use the HTB.

 

Simo

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>