I had followed that discussion, but my doubt remains. For MASQUERADE
too, it depends on the 'src' parameter, which was configured statically.
But after the interface comes up with a new address, the initial
configuration will be invalid because 'src' is not correct anymore, it
seems...Or have I have misunderstood the concept?
-----Original Message-----
From: Manish Kathuria [mailto:mkathuria@tuxtechnologies.co.in]
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 1:36 PM
To: Salim S I
Cc: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl; tomlobato@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [LARTC] DGD patch not detecting dead gateway
On 5/11/07, Salim S I <salim.si@cipherium.com.tw> wrote:
>
> I have a doubt. If you use such a script monitoring the link status
with
> ping and then reconfiguring, why do you need the DGD patch? You need
to do
> some reconfiguration (change multipath to a single default route)
anyway if
> you use the script, right?
The patches take care of many other issues also. Please refer to the
archives here:
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2007q1/020403.html
--
Manish Kathuria
Tux Technologies
http://www.tuxtechnologies.co.in/
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
|