LARTC
[Top] [All Lists]

[LARTC] Re: big problem with HTB/CBQ and CPU for more than 1.700 custome

To: <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
Subject: [LARTC] Re: big problem with HTB/CBQ and CPU for more than 1.700 customers
From: "Pablo Fernandes Yahoo" <fernandes_pablo@yahoo.com.br>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 00:25:43 +0100
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: lartc-list@securepoint.com
Delivered-to: lartc@outpost.ds9a.nl
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.br; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Mailer:Thread-Index:X-MimeOLE; b=tqlKrWPSFMm3C4EFn4AZ+keRPIyvnG0KGqJMLuOX3FtMdF4RpyggIN3ZcoQJvH1tpXSgDVsdi94M1a2OaaYq91Gcjo4GSHjZXIY7UnL/deDFS4wistunmpp2+8QLVvQbH1exndM1Gheou8q77LwpEpFDIOYB9r89hwogAw7gv+g= ;
List-archive: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc>
List-help: <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=help>
List-id: "Mailinglist of the Linux Advanced Routing &amp; Traffic Control project" <lartc.mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-post: <mailto:lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc>, <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc>, <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: lartc-bounces@mailman.ds9a.nl
Thread-index: Acehf4L4eeZALrkNRVOCsfxxidtWzg==

Hey,

 

I have some links that you could be interested on them:

 

http://www.geocities.com/asimshankar/notes/linux-networking-code.txt

http://oss.sgi.com/archives/netdev/2004-06/msg00162.html

http://www.spec.org/osg/web99/results/res2003q3/web99-20030818-00245.html

http://www.intel.com/support/network/sb/cs-009209.htm

 

All of them talks about the interrupts.

 

So, what do you think should i do with my e1000? What do you think could be the best board for sites as 8.000 customers? My problem is exact these lots of interruptions.

 

Thank you in advance!

 

Regards

 

>I have classes configured by protocol..

> 

>My NIC is the e1000 too (default parameters), but I'm using off-board cards (with scalable i/o support - good for multi->core setups). The main problem I had was the number of interruptions (~ 10.000/s)... 

>With IRQ balance activated, each NIC got used with a specific processor core, and the use of CPU on these cores was always >100%.

> 

>I've solved this problem in my setup (2 Quad-Cores), deactivating the IRQ balance, that caused the interruptions to be >processed by all the

>8 cores.

> 

>Are you doing p2p control on this server? This is usually what takes more CPU usage..

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>