LARTC
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [LARTC] Redundant internet connections.

To: Mail List - Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Redundant internet connections.
From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@riverviewtech.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 10:52:44 -0500
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: lartc-list@securepoint.com
Delivered-to: lartc@outpost.ds9a.nl
In-reply-to: <467A9AB1.4090902@rabbit.us>
List-archive: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc>
List-help: <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=help>
List-id: "Mailinglist of the Linux Advanced Routing &amp; Traffic Control project" <lartc.mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-post: <mailto:lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc>, <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc>, <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Riverview Technologies Inc.
References: <467A2354.1070805@riverviewtech.net> <467A9AB1.4090902@rabbit.us>
Reply-to: gtaylor+reply@riverviewtech.net
Sender: lartc-bounces@mailman.ds9a.nl
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20070511 Thunderbird/2.0.0.0 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666
On 06/21/07 10:35, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
I don't know about any working in-kernel solutions, but you can do it trivially with netfilter and a cronjob:

<snip>

If I understand what you are proposing correctly, it looks like you are jumping to a sub-chain used used only for counting traffic. If the counters show traffic, you are saying that traffic is flowing across the link and thus the link must be up and functional. Right?

If the link is not up and functional the take action to not use that link.

I'm also not clearly understanding how matching the source IP will work on either link considering that both links will have the capability to pass traffic for the same globally routable DMZ subnet. Though I think this could be mitigated by altering the rules to count packets going out or coming in an interface rather than based on source / destination IP.

Of course you can have up to 1 minute of downtime, but it does not look so bad IMO.

One minute may or may not be bad. I know that it is a long time (when you are trying to ssh) but automatic failover is better than manual. And the one minute will probably be much faster than manual failover.



Grant. . . .
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>