LARTC
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [LARTC] Load Balance and SNAT problem.

To: Mail List - Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Load Balance and SNAT problem.
From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@riverviewtech.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 20:51:30 -0500
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: lartc-list@securepoint.com
Delivered-to: lartc@outpost.ds9a.nl
In-reply-to: <46815078.5060705@rabbit.us>
List-archive: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc>
List-help: <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=help>
List-id: "Mailinglist of the Linux Advanced Routing &amp; Traffic Control project" <lartc.mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-post: <mailto:lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc>, <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc>, <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <7e47206b0706242007q487365d3gb7c12658b9669edd@mail.gmail.com> <467FD592.5010700@riverviewtech.net> <4680B634.9060802@rabbit.us> <468124A6.8000101@riverviewtech.net> <46815078.5060705@rabbit.us>
Sender: lartc-bounces@mailman.ds9a.nl
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (Windows/20070604)
(Sorry, I'm not sure but the answer does impact this discussion.)

On 6/26/2007 12:44 PM, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
so traffic to the same site will leave via the same channel, regardless if the other channel is empty or not.

Is the caching per route or per source IP? I'm guessing that it is per route decision such that any and all clients will use the same cached route thus not using additional interfaces.

Or is this a clear and concise reason why load balancing via Netfilter would be a better approach?



Grant. . . .
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>