LARTC
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [LARTC] Load Balance and SNAT problem.

from [Grant Taylor] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Mail List - Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Load Balance and SNAT problem.
From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@riverviewtech.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 02:57:36 -0500
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: lartc-list@securepoint.com
Delivered-to: lartc@outpost.ds9a.nl
In-reply-to: <46821767.2060302@vsnl.com>
List-archive: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc>
List-help: <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=help>
List-id: "Mailinglist of the Linux Advanced Routing &amp; Traffic Control project" <lartc.mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-post: <mailto:lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc>, <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc>, <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <7e47206b0706242007q487365d3gb7c12658b9669edd@mail.gmail.com> <"4 6 7FD592.5010700"@riverviewtech.net> <4680B634.9060802@rabbit.us> <468124A6.8000101@riverviewtech.net> <46815078.5060705@rabbit.us> <4681C2A2.2010208@riverviewtech.net> <4681C560.50008@vsnl.com> <4681C676.6030407@riverviewtech.net> <4681C806.9060703@vsnl.com> <468213BC.3090706@riverviewtech.net> <46821767.2060302@vsnl.com>
Sender: lartc-bounces@mailman.ds9a.nl
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (Windows/20070604) 
On 6/27/2007 2:53 AM, Mohan Sundaram wrote:

Pardon my earlier mail.


*nod*  Pardon my reply.  ;)
This says if equalize patch/keyword is used, packet randomisation happens. Exactly what we want, is it not? 

(Referring back to your earlier message...)

Yes, I think this is what we want in this scenario.



Grant. . . .
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [LARTC] Load Balance and SNAT problem., Grant Taylor
Next by Date:  Re: [LARTC] Load Balance and SNAT problem., Peter Rabbitson
Previous by Thread:  Re: [LARTC] Load Balance and SNAT problem., Grant Taylor
Next by Thread:  Re: [LARTC] Load Balance and SNAT problem., VladSun
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]