LARTC
[Top] [All Lists]

[LARTC] The netiquette of monitoring...

To: Mail List - Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
Subject: [LARTC] The netiquette of monitoring...
From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@riverviewtech.net>
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 01:29:39 -0500
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: lartc-list@securepoint.com
Delivered-to: lartc@outpost.ds9a.nl
List-archive: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc>
List-help: <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=help>
List-id: "Mailinglist of the Linux Advanced Routing &amp; Traffic Control project" <lartc.mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-post: <mailto:lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc>, <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc>, <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: lartc-bounces@mailman.ds9a.nl
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (Windows/20070604)
What is the proper netiquette of monitoring a router? How often is often enough verses too often? How large should the monitoring probes be? Is there an aggregate speed (bps) or amount (pps) or both (bps and pps) that should not be exceeded?



Grant. . . .
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [LARTC] The netiquette of monitoring..., Grant Taylor <=