LARTC
[Top] [All Lists]

[LARTC] Multi-Path Load Balancing

To: "lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl" <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
Subject: [LARTC] Multi-Path Load Balancing
From: "Patrick (Xentech)" <patrick@xentech.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 20:44:53 +0200
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: lartc-list@securepoint.com
Delivered-to: lartc@outpost.ds9a.nl
Importance: Normal
List-archive: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc>
List-help: <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=help>
List-id: "Mailinglist of the Linux Advanced Routing &amp; Traffic Control project" <lartc.mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-post: <mailto:lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc>, <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc>, <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: lartc-bounces@mailman.ds9a.nl
User-agent: Kerio Outlook Connector (6.2.0.1492)

Hi,

 

We have the following config:

 

Servers -> BGP router (10 Gbit)

            -> BGP router (1 Gbit)

            -> BGP router (100 mbit)

 

We would like to do the following.

 

The server should first fill the 100 mbit link, then fill the 1 Gbit link, and then the 10 Gbit link, when traffic increases.

 

The resverse applies when traffic decreases.

 

I found lots of docs on round-robin weighted link, etc, but that would actually load balance these links evenly.

 

We would like have it work like a bucket system though.

 

Any ideas?

 

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [LARTC] Multi-Path Load Balancing, Patrick (Xentech) <=