LARTC
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

[LARTC] Re: tc n00b

from [Abhijit Menon-Sen] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Jonathan Gazeley <jonathan.gazeley@bristol.ac.uk>
Subject: [LARTC] Re: tc n00b
From: Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams@toroid.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 18:56:41 +0530
Cc: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: lartc-list@securepoint.com
Delivered-to: lartc@outpost.ds9a.nl
In-reply-to: <46ADE4A6.1020808@bristol.ac.uk>
List-archive: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc>
List-help: <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=help>
List-id: "Mailinglist of the Linux Advanced Routing &amp; Traffic Control project" <lartc.mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-post: <mailto:lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc>, <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc>, <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <46ADCE10.6080906@bristol.ac.uk> <20070730121432.GB30519@toroid.org> <46ADE4A6.1020808@bristol.ac.uk>
Sender: lartc-bounces@mailman.ds9a.nl 
At 2007-07-30 14:16:22 +0100, jonathan.gazeley@bristol.ac.uk wrote:
>
> I don't really understand that error - especially as the identical
> code does work for the download limits.

I think it's only that you define $WAN and later use $wAN, so tc thinks
it's missing an argument, and gets confused.

-- ams
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  [LARTC] Re: tc n00b, Jonathan Gazeley
Next by Date:  [LARTC] Re: tc n00b, Abhijit Menon-Sen
Previous by Thread:  [LARTC] Re: tc n00b, Jonathan Gazeley
Next by Thread:  [LARTC] Re: tc n00b, Jonathan Gazeley
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]