As far as I'm concerned, it doesn't matter what I use, so long as I get
the result - I just need to have each user alloted a certain upload and
download speed. Nothing too fancy.
I tried switching to HTB. I amended my commands but I don't know if my kernel supports it. I've got CentOS 5.0 with kernel 2.6.18 but I now get errors like these: 137.222.235.125 RTNETLINK answers: No such file or directory RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument We have an error talking to the kernel RTNETLINK answers: No such file or directory RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument We have an error talking to the kernel Any clues? (Sorry to ask so many favours, and thanks for your time) Jonathan Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote: At 2007-07-30 14:36:03 +0100, jonathan.gazeley@bristol.ac.uk wrote:137.222.235.125 Error: Qdisc "tbf" is classless. Error: Qdisc "tbf" is classless.One of these is from the $LAN line, and one from the $WAN one, right?Any ideas what's broken? I'm not so hot on classful queueing disciplines!It's not really clear to me what you want, but I'm guessing you want to add a CBQ (not TBF) class, and then add a TBF qdisc (with tc qdisc add) under that class. But I don't know why you would want to do that. (I'd recommend using HTB instead of CBQ, and attaching a prio qdisc to each HTB class.) -- ams -- ------------------------ Jonathan Gazeley Wireless & VPN Team Information Systems & Computing University of Bristol ------------------------ _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [LARTC] Re: tc n00b, Abhijit Menon-Sen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [LARTC] bonding of 2 lines, Laurence vd Krieken |
| Previous by Thread: | [LARTC] Re: tc n00b, Abhijit Menon-Sen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [LARTC] Re: tc n00b, Martin Milata |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |