Nessus
[Top] [All Lists]

flash install left part of old version behind

To: nessus@list.nessus.org
Subject: flash install left part of old version behind
From: Bob Babcock <rbabcock@cfa.harvard.edu>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 15:24:58 -0500 (EST)
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: nessus-list1@securepoint.com
Delivered-to: nessus@list.nessus.org
List-archive: <http://mail.nessus.org/pipermail/nessus>
List-help: <mailto:nessus-request@list.nessus.org?subject=help>
List-id: Discussion of Nessus software <nessus.list.nessus.org>
List-post: <mailto:nessus@list.nessus.org>
List-subscribe: <http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus>, <mailto:nessus-request@list.nessus.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus>, <mailto:nessus-request@list.nessus.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: rbabcock@cfa.harvard.edu
Sender: nessus-bounces@list.nessus.org
Scanning a win/xp machine with Windows Nessus, plugin 11952 says the flash
version is older than 7.0.19.0, but Shavlik says the version is 7.0.68.0.
Looking closer, I find
  flash7a.ocx  7.0.68.0
  flash.ocx    6.0.79.0
in \windows\system32\macromed\flash.  Looks like the install of version 7
didn't remove all of version 6 and the plugin is seeing the old version.
(I modified the plugin to display the version number and got 6.0.79.0.)
The registry entry at
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Macromedia\FlashPlayer\CurrentVersion says
7,0,68,0.  Unless there's some way the old, vulnerable flash can be
triggered, I think the plugin should ignore the old file.
_______________________________________________
Nessus mailing list
Nessus@list.nessus.org
http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>