Nessus
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: flash install left part of old version behind

To: nessus@list.nessus.org
Subject: Re: flash install left part of old version behind
From: "George A. Theall" <theall@tenablesecurity.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 17:17:07 -0500
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: nessus-list1@securepoint.com
Delivered-to: nessus@list.nessus.org
In-reply-to: <200611132024.kADKOwXc028005@cfa0.cfa.harvard.edu>
List-archive: <http://mail.nessus.org/pipermail/nessus>
List-help: <mailto:nessus-request@list.nessus.org?subject=help>
List-id: Discussion of Nessus software <nessus.list.nessus.org>
List-post: <mailto:nessus@list.nessus.org>
List-subscribe: <http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus>, <mailto:nessus-request@list.nessus.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus>, <mailto:nessus-request@list.nessus.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <200611132024.kADKOwXc028005@cfa0.cfa.harvard.edu>
Sender: nessus-bounces@list.nessus.org
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061110)
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 03:24:58PM -0500, Bob Babcock wrote:

Scanning a win/xp machine with Windows Nessus, plugin 11952 says the flash
version is older than 7.0.19.0, but Shavlik says the version is 7.0.68.0.
Looking closer, I find
  flash7a.ocx  7.0.68.0
  flash.ocx    6.0.79.0
in \windows\system32\macromed\flash.

Thanks, I modified plugin #11952, which handles detection, to check for flash7a.ocx before flash.ocx; that should correct this issue.

The change should be available via nessus-update-plugins later tonight.

George
--
theall@tenablesecurity.com
_______________________________________________
Nessus mailing list
Nessus@list.nessus.org
http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>