Nessus
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: net::nessus::scanlite plugins_prefs

To: <nessus@list.nessus.org>
Subject: Re: net::nessus::scanlite plugins_prefs
From: "Steve Reagan" <reagans@dhr.state.ga.us>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 17:48:20 -0400
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: nessus-list1@securepoint.com
Delivered-to: nessus@list.nessus.org
List-archive: <http://mail.nessus.org/pipermail/nessus>
List-help: <mailto:nessus-request@list.nessus.org?subject=help>
List-id: Discussion of Nessus software <nessus.list.nessus.org>
List-post: <mailto:nessus@list.nessus.org>
List-subscribe: <http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus>, <mailto:nessus-request@list.nessus.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus>, <mailto:nessus-request@list.nessus.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: nessus-bounces@list.nessus.org
With my McAfee software disabled, ScanLite did not report a hole when I scanned with plugin ID 16193 (anti-virus check). However, when I scanned with plugin ID 12107 (McAfee anti-virus check - a dependent of ID 16193), it shows a hole. Is there any reason that scanning plugin 16193 from a Unix/Win client would show the McAfee hole and the ScanLite would not, considering ScanLite shows the hole when the dependency McAfee plugin (ID 12107) is scanned directly?
 
Thanks,
Steve 
_______________________________________________
Nessus mailing list
Nessus@list.nessus.org
http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>