| To: | Nessus@list.nessus.org |
|---|---|
| Subject: | windows-based nessus ignores host exclusion rules |
| From: | "test test" <partcrash@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 5 Apr 2007 14:28:54 -0400 |
| Cc: | |
| Delivered-to: | sp-com-lists@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | nessus-list1@securepoint.com |
| Delivered-to: | Nessus@list.nessus.org |
| Dkim-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=Rt04aklwJppUdWsKeSXDruHpQH0w/LZFqrSuiJ3IONISb7R3L6wRRbXBmuiEangn+lb3P1k+Zbuup2Az7g5SzBxnMEkzRgntU1lPqao6TZ/ogpyfBFYd6CKaqnTlLWuLbBA8wBMpkMcEwR/fdrD1hl4E4lBIB9uU7p67QqKOlHo= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=gxG2SWiaBNUA8a28MindOvS/b5e+3SEPcIJwjXkNiFJynqaieX2oxXifhnoXPvgPjP60KcohesPT5pe7iWHo7W0qA55zxh/hsQ3vqJQbptzjW18/52YQ67hKdEBPDWfSUMk2Ki6YftIir/naGVuALtrHNZIPGrChqaDpJX0dAs4= |
| List-archive: | <http://mail.nessus.org/pipermail/nessus> |
| List-help: | <mailto:nessus-request@list.nessus.org?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Discussion of Nessus software <nessus.list.nessus.org> |
| List-post: | <mailto:nessus@list.nessus.org> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus>, <mailto:nessus-request@list.nessus.org?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus>, <mailto:nessus-request@list.nessus.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | nessus-bounces@list.nessus.org |
|
Hello everybody, So I do have the latest and greatest nessus scanner for Windows (3.0.5) and I am using it with nessj front end. However, I have noticed that when I apply a "reject xx.xx.xx.xx" rule, the xx.xx.xx.xx host still gets scanned. In other words- the scanner ignores the rules. Looking in the Nessus log I see this: 2007-04-05 14:02:48 -0400, Client, <|> CLIENT 2007-04-05 14:02:48 -0400, Client, CLIENT <|> RULES <|> 2007-04-05 14:02:48 -0400, Client, reject 10.1.1.10 2007-04-05 14:02:48 -0400, Client, <|> CLIENT 2007-04-05 14:02:48 -0400, Client, CLIENT <|> LONG_ATTACK <|> 2007-04-05 14:02:48 -0400, Client, 14 2007-04-05 14:02:48 -0400, Client, 10.1.1.10, 2007-04-05 14:02:48 -0400, Server, SERVER <|> PREFERENCES_ERRORS <|> 2007-04-05 14:02:48 -0400, Server, <|> SERVER 2007-04-05 14:02:48 -0400, Server, SERVER <|> TIME <|> SCAN_START <|> Thu Apr 05 14:02:48 2007 <|> SERVER 2007-04-05 14:02:53 -0400, Server, SERVER <|> TIME <|> HOST_START <|> 10.1.1.10 <|> Thu Apr 05 14:02:53 2007 <|> SERVER 2007-04-05 14:02:53 -0400, Server, SERVER <|> TIME <|> HOST_START <|> 10.1.1.10 <|> Thu Apr 05 14:02:53 2007 <|> SERVER 2007-04-05 14:02:54 -0400, Server, s:a:10.1.1.10:1:3149 2007-04-05 14:02:57 -0400, Server, s:a:10.1.1.10:32 :3149 2007-04-05 14:03:00 -0400, Server, s:a:10.1.1.10:65:3149 2007-04-05 14:03:03 -0400, Client, CLIENT <|> STOP_WHOLE_TEST <|> CLIENT 2007-04-05 14:03:04 -0400, Server, SERVER <|> TIME <|> SCAN_END <|> Thu Apr 05 14:03:04 2007 <|> SERVER 2007-04-05 14:03:04 -0400, Server, SERVER <|> BYE <|> BYE <|> SERVER I can see that the rule "reject 10.1.1.10 is passed to the server, but the scan still occurs. Any ideas? Thank you AJ _______________________________________________ Nessus mailing list Nessus@list.nessus.org http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | kerberos telnet check, Tim Rupp |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: kerberos telnet check, Renaud Deraison |
| Previous by Thread: | kerberos telnet check, Tim Rupp |
| Next by Thread: | Re: windows-based nessus ignores host exclusion rules, Renaud Deraison |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |