Nessus
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: plugin 10919

To: <Nessus@list.nessus.org>
Subject: RE: plugin 10919
From: "Scott Pate" <spate@Spohncentral.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 11:28:24 -0500
Cc:
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: nessus-list1@securepoint.com
Delivered-to: Nessus@list.nessus.org
In-reply-to: <m3abz84s2q.fsf@kissmedeadly.afraid.org>
List-archive: <http://mail.nessus.org/pipermail/nessus>
List-help: <mailto:nessus-request@list.nessus.org?subject=help>
List-id: Discussion of Nessus software <nessus.list.nessus.org>
List-post: <mailto:nessus@list.nessus.org>
List-subscribe: <http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus>, <mailto:nessus-request@list.nessus.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus>, <mailto:nessus-request@list.nessus.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: nessus-bounces@list.nessus.org
Thread-index: AcdVGpaC5GQ+wLkAT9y8QKzS5R8FMAnMg6Fw
Thread-topic: plugin 10919
I am having trouble tracking down the reason why I see this plugin fire
off on almost every scan.  I'm not ruling out anything on my end (T1,
router, firewall...) but I have tried many different options and
scenarios, and still see this plugin, although the results are seemingly
fine otherwise. 

I understand that the plugin gets a list of port from the KB, then
attempts a SYN to those ports, which is very basic. It is difficult to
verify the ports at the exact time the plugin is launched, but I have no
reason to believe the service is being crashed.

Is there a config issue I may be missing, or have others had this
problem as well?

[root@scanner ~]# uname -a
Linux scanner 2.6.18-1.2200.fc5smp #1 SMP Sat Oct 14 17:15:35 EDT 2006
i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
[root@scanner ~]# cat /etc/fedora-release
Fedora Core release 5 (Bordeaux)
[root@scanner ~]# NessusClient -h
NessusClient, version 1.0.2.
[root@scanner ~]# nessusd -h
nessusd, version 3.0.5.

thx




-----Original Message-----
From: Michel Arboi [mailto:mikhail@nessus.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 12:12 PM
To: Scott Pate
Cc: Nessus@list.nessus.org
Subject: Re: plugin 10919

On Tue Feb 20 2007 at 18:53, Scott Pate wrote:

> check_ports.nasl determines a port to be closed, do other plugins 
> launch against the port after that

Not relevant, as check_ports.nasl is an "ACT_END", i.e. it runs after
all other plugins. 

> Does the plugin determine a port to be closed if it fails to open a 
> tcp socket (in which case the port may not be closed), or if it 
> receives a RST (in which case the port is most definitely closed)?

It tries to open a connection through the standard API. The port might
be filtered.
  
> What would be the implications of disabling this plugin? 

None.
_______________________________________________
Nessus mailing list
Nessus@list.nessus.org
http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • RE: plugin 10919, Scott Pate <=