| To: | netfilter@lists.netfilter.org |
|---|---|
| Subject: | ipq_set_verdict() |
| From: | Luca Bedogni <ml@lucabedogni.it> |
| Date: | Thu, 14 Dec 2006 18:12:18 +0100 |
| Delivered-to: | sp-com-lists@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | netfilter-list1@securepoint.com |
| List-archive: | </pipermail/netfilter> |
| List-help: | <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=help> |
| List-id: | General discussion and user questions <netfilter.lists.netfilter.org> |
| List-post: | <mailto:netfilter@lists.netfilter.org> |
| List-subscribe: | <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>, <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>, <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.9.5 |
Hi all
first message for me here.
I'm trying to study netfilter and the kernel, in particular for the part
regarding MTU. I'm having a bit of trouble understanding a thing:
if i get a packet from the netfilter queue, adding 4 bit and exceeding the
MTU, and then call ipq_set_verdict with parameter NF_ACCEPT, what happens? Is
the packet dropped by the kernel, by iptables or he can goes freely?
Regards
--
Debian Powered GNU/Linux User #373118
Bedogni Luca - Blog | http://blog.lucabedogni.it
Site | http://www.lucabedogni.it
Debianizzati - www.debianizzati.org | Founder Member
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Install questions, Ken Arany |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Install questions, Sietse van Zanen |
| Previous by Thread: | Install questions, Ken Arany |
| Next by Thread: | Shouldn't this rule catch all packets, jwlargent |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |