| To: | netfilter@lists.netfilter.org |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Catching un-DNAT'ed packets |
| From: | Покотиленко Костик <casper@meteor.dp.ua> |
| Date: | Mon, 25 Dec 2006 15:40:30 +0200 |
| Delivered-to: | sp-com-lists@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | netfilter-list1@securepoint.com |
| List-archive: | </pipermail/netfilter> |
| List-help: | <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=help> |
| List-id: | General discussion and user questions <netfilter.lists.netfilter.org> |
| List-post: | <mailto:netfilter@lists.netfilter.org> |
| List-subscribe: | <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>, <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>, <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Organization: | СК "Метеор" |
| Reply-to: | casper@meteor.dp.ua |
| Sender: | netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org |
Hi. Is it possible to catch un-DNAT'ed packets with iptables' -j ULOG target? Where does the un-DNAT occurs and is there table/chain that is processed after un-DNAT? The problem I have is that replay packets got catched with real source address, not the one the client has initially connected to. I was catching replay packets in mangle/POSTROUTING. -- Покотиленко Костик <casper@meteor.dp.ua> |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: DNAT not working, Pascal Hambourg |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [LARTC] Interesting article about punching holes in firewalls..., Torsten Luettgert |
| Previous by Thread: | [ADMINISTRATIVE] bugzilla.netfilter.org running again, Harald Welte |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Catching un-DNAT'ed packets, Pascal Hambourg |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |