Hello Pascal, Monday, January 29, 2007, 3:07:54 PM, you wrote: PH> This may be related to the thread "Dropped fin acks (iptables + lvs)" PH> above, as in both cases most affected packets seem to be FIN/ACK and PH> RST/ACK. I have not read the archives, I'll download and read them soon. Anyway, it seems that you are right, it misses only FIN packets... but it probably misses them in PREROUTING, as I have stated in another post in this thread. -- Fabio "Kurgan" Muzzi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: SNAT seems to "miss" some packets, Fabio Muzzi |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: iptables NEW TABLE request. WAS[Re: Catching un-DNAT'ed packets], Покотиленко Костик |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: SNAT seems to "miss" some packets, Pascal Hambourg |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [2.6 patch] NF_CONNTRACK_H323 must depend on (IPV6 || IPV6=n), Patrick McHardy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |